General
NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES et al.
386 U.S. 349·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 968.
Decided March 20, 1967.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Ruth Kessler Toch, Solicitor General, Dunton F. Tyrian, Assistant Solicitor General, Matthew A. Tiffany, Assistant Attorney General, and Walter J. Myskowski for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Gihnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al.
R, J. Murphy and D. M. Tolmie for appellee railroads; William C. Serinett, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Edward Friedman for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Eugene T. Liipjert for the Port Authority of Allegheny County et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.