Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Murray et al. v. Curlett et al.; School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania, et al. v. Schempp et al., 1962 — 371 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
General
Murray et al. v. Curlett et al.; School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania, et al. v. Schempp et al.
371 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 19, 1962.
No. 119.
No. 142.
Murray et al. v. Curlett et al., School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania, et al. v. Schempp et al.
Theodore Leskes, Edwin J. Lukas, Arnold Forster, Paul Hartman and Sol Rabkin on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City.
Certiorari, ante, p. 809, to the Court of Appeals of Maryland; and
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 807.) The motion of the American Jewish Committee et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, is granted.