Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank M. EATON, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error, 1928 — 31 F.2d 1011 · caselaw · US
General
Frank M. EATON, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
31 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank M. EATON, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 31, 1928.
No. 8123.
C. C. Putnam and J. E. O’Brien, both of Des Moines, Iowa, for plaintiff in error.
Ross R. Mowry, U. S. Atty., of Newton, Iowa, and Ray C. Fountain, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Des Moines, Iowa, and Frank F. Wilson, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Mt. Ayr, Iowa.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of parties.