Contracts · MBE-tested
Selena F. Royle, Respondent, v. Nathaniel C. Goodwin, Appellant
191 N.Y. 551·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Selena F. Royle, Respondent, v. Nathaniel C. Goodwin, Appellant.
Boyle v. Goodwin, 118 App. Div. 906, affirmed.
(Argued March 10, 1908;
decided March 31, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 21, 1907, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of a written contract.
Archibald Foote Clarke and Joseph D. Redding fir appellant.
William R. Wilder and John Ewen for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J.,' Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.