Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Walker; Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co. v. Brown; and Observer Transportation Co. v. Lee et al., 1969 — 394 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
General
Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Walker; Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co. v. Brown; and Observer Transportation Co. v. Lee et al.
394 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 981.
No. 1000.
No. 1001.
Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Walker; Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co. v. Brown; and Observer Transportation Co. v. Lee et al.
Whiteford S. Blakeney for petitioner in each case.
Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Conrad O. Pearson, Joseph W. Bishop, Jr., and Albert J. Rosenthal for respondents in each case.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: No. 981, 405 F. 2d 645; Nos. 1000 and 1001, 405 F. 2d 887.