Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank Phelps, Appellant, v. Joel B. Erhardt, as Receiver, etc., Respondent, 1889 — 117 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Frank Phelps, Appellant, v. Joel B. Erhardt, as Receiver, etc., Respondent
117 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank Phelps, Appellant, v. Joel B. Erhardt, as Receiver, etc., Respondent.
(Argued October 21, 1889;
decided October 29, 1889.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made at the May Term, 1889, which affirmed, so far as appealed from, a judgment in favor of defendant, entered on a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Sherman Evarts for motion.
Thomas E. Rochfort and Edward B. Whitney opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.