Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward R. Ladew et al., Respondents, v. John W. Hart, Late Sheriff of Albany County, et al., Appellants, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
Edward R. Ladew et al., Respondents, v. John W. Hart, Late Sheriff of Albany County, et al., Appellants
155 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward R. Ladew et al., Respondents, v. John W. Hart, Late Sheriff of Albany County, et al., Appellants.
Ladew v. Kart, 8 App. Div. 150, affirmed.
(Argued January 11, 1898;
decided January 25, 1898.)
Appeal from a final judgment of the Supreme Court, entered September 12, 1896, upon a decision of the Appellate Division in the third judicial department affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court overruling a demurrer to the complaint, on ti’ial at Special Term.
Isaac Lawson for appellants.
Charles E. Patterson and Alpheus T. BuTkeley for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
J udgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Haight, J., absent.