Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. George DRUMHELLER, Respondent, 1933 — 65 F.2d 1013 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. George DRUMHELLER, Respondent
65 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. George DRUMHELLER, Respondent.
No. 7186.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1933.
Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
John P. Watson, of Walla Walla, Wash., for respondent.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE and GARRE CHT, Circuit Judges'.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for petitioner, consented to by counsel for respondent, ordered petition to review dismissed; mandate forthwith.