General
Roedenbeck Farms, Inc., et al. v. Broussard et al.
308 U.S. 514·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 468.
Roedenbeck Farms, Inc., et al. v. Broussard et al.
November 6, 1939.
Mr. John H. Crooker for appellants. Messrs. E. B. Pickett, E. E. Easterling, and Will E. Orgain for appellees. Messrs. William D. Gordon and E. E. Easterling for Marrs McLean, appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 308; Zadig v. Baldwin, 166 U. S. 485, 488; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155, 158; (2) Roberts v. City of New York, 295 U. S. 264, 278; Seattle Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Cross Lake Shooting & Fishing Club v. Louisiana, 224 U. S. 632, 638; Ross v. Oregon, 227 U. S. 150, 162.