Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Eli M. Upton et al., Respondents, v. Scottish Union and National Insurance Company, Appellant, 1904 — 177 N.Y. 580 · caselaw · US
General
Eli M. Upton et al., Respondents, v. Scottish Union and National Insurance Company, Appellant
177 N.Y. 580·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Eli M. Upton et al., Respondents, v. Scottish Union and National Insurance Company, Appellant.
Upton v. Scottish Union <6 Nat. Ins. Oo., 77 App. Div. 633, affirmed.
(Argued January 28, 1904;
decided February 16, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment entered December 30, 1902, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, overruling defendant’s exceptions ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion' for a new trial and directing judgment for plaintiffs upon the verdict.
Horace McGuire for appellant.
Elbridge L. Adams for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, .Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.