Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Herring v. District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, 1965 — 382 U.S. 935 · caselaw · US
General
Herring v. District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District
382 U.S. 935·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 185,
Misc.
Herring v. District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District.
Petitioner pro se.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and George J. Roth, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.