Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
City of Passaic v. General Electric Co. et al., 1959 — 359 U.S. 1006 · caselaw · US
Tax
City of Passaic v. General Electric Co. et al.
359 U.S. 1006·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
May 27, 1959.
City of Passaic v. General Electric Co. et al.
William N. Gurtman for appellant.
John W. Hand for the General Electric Co., and David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Theodore I. Botter, Deputy Attorney General, for the Division of Tax Appeals, Department of the Treasury of New Jersey, appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Appeal dismissed pursuant to stipulation under Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.