Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CLINTON v. VIRGINIA, 1964 — 377 U.S. 158 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
CLINTON v. VIRGINIA
377 U.S. 15812 L. Ed. 2d 213·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice White dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CLINTON v. VIRGINIA.
No. 294.
Argued April 27, 1964.
Decided May 4, 1964.
Calvin H. Childress argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs was Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to strike the supplemental brief on behalf of the respondent is denied. The judgment is reversed. Silverman v. United States, 365 U. S. 505; Ker v. California, 374 U. S. 23.
[CONCURRENCE — Mr. Justice Clark,]
Mr. Justice Clark,
concurring: Since the Court finds that the “spiked” mike used by the police officers penetrated petitioner’s premises sufficiently to be an actual trespass thereof, I join in the judgment.
Mr. Justice White dissents.