Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES, Applicant v. CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al., 2018 — 139 S. Ct. 5 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES, Applicant v. CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al.
139 S. Ct. 5201 L. Ed. 2d 1128·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CROSSROADS GRASSROOTS POLICY STRATEGIES, Applicant
v.
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON, et al.
No. 18A274.
Supreme Court of the United States
Sept. 15, 2018.
ORDER
[MAJORITY — Chief Justice of the United States]
UPON CONSIDERATION of the application of counsel for the applicant and the response filed thereto,
IT IS ORDERED that the order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 16-259, is hereby stayed pending further order of the undersigned or of the Court.
/s/ John G. Roberts, Jr.
Chief Justice of the United States