Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Rogers, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 516 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Rogers, Appellant
186 N.Y. 516·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John Rogers, Appellant.
People v. Rogers, 112 App. Div. 921, affirmed.
(Argued June 14, 1906;
decided October 2, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 20, 1906, affirming a judgment of the Kings County Court entered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of attempted grand larceny in the second degree.
George W. Martin for appellant.
John F. Clarke, Distn'iet Attorney (Peter P. Smith of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed ; no opinion. .
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.