Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James D. Coveney, Respondent, v. Henry S. Kearny, Commissioner of Public Buildings, etc., of the City of New York, Appellant, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James D. Coveney, Respondent, v. Henry S. Kearny, Commissioner of Public Buildings, etc., of the City of New York, Appellant
161 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. James D. Coveney, Respondent, v. Henry S. Kearny, Commissioner of Public Buildings, etc., of the City of New York, Appellant.
People ex rel. Coveney v. Kearny, 44 App. Div. 449, affirmed.
(Argued January 9, 1900;
decided January 23, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 8,1899, which reversed an order of the Special Term denying relator’s application for a peremptory writ of mandamus, directing his reinstatement in the position of inspector of electric wires and appliances in the department of public buildings, etc., of the city of New York, and granted such application.
N John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (Theodore ConnoVy and Terence Farley of counsel), for appellant.
James M. Hwit for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Vann, JJ.