Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Home Transfer & Storage Co., Inc., 1956 — 352 U.S. 884 · caselaw · US
General
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Home Transfer & Storage Co., Inc.
352 U.S. 884·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 365.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Home Transfer & Storage Co., Inc.
Robert W. Oinnane and Leo H. Pou for appellant. Briefs of amici curiae in support of appellant were filed by Charles P. Reynolds and Carl Helmetag, Jr. for the Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co. et al., and Peter T. Beardsley for the American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is affirmed.