Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Isidor SEGAL, Bankrupt, v. ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORPORATION, Appellant, 1926 — 12 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of Isidor SEGAL, Bankrupt, v. ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORPORATION, Appellant
12 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Isidor SEGAL, Bankrupt, v. ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORPORATION, Appellant.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 17, 1926.)
No. 334.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Remington & Meek and Harold Remington, all of New York City, for petitioner.
Nelson Ruttenberg, of New York City, for alleged bankrupt.
Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
A majority of this court are of opinion that the facts proven require an affirmance of the order below with costs; and it is so ordered.