General
Valda M. Canfield, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
139 N.Y. 617·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Valda M. Canfield, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 23, 1893;
decided October 3, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of Buffalo, entered upon an order made July 6, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
James F. Gluck for appellant.
John Laughlin for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.