Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HIGHLAND MILK CONDENSING COMPANY, a Corporation, v. UNITED STATES, 1930 — 39 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
Corporations
HIGHLAND MILK CONDENSING COMPANY, a Corporation, v. UNITED STATES
39 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Claims·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HIGHLAND MILK CONDENSING COMPANY, a Corporation, v. UNITED STATES.
No. E-588.
Court of Claims.
April 7, 1930.
G. M. Owlett, of Wellsboro, Pa. (Crichton & Owlett, of Wellsboro, Pa., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Percy M. Cox, of Washington, D. C., and Herman J. Galloway, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the United States.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
Memorandum.
PER CURIAM.
This is a companion case to Helvetia Milk Condensing Co., Inc., v. United States, 39 F.(2d) 1012, this day decided, and is controlled by the conclusion in that case. The two cases were argued and submitted together.
WILLIAMS and LITTLETON, Judges did not hear this case and took no part in its decision.