Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Elizabeth A. S. Read et al., Appellants, v. John A. Miller et al., Respondents, 1888 — 110 N.Y. 656 · caselaw · US
General
Elizabeth A. S. Read et al., Appellants, v. John A. Miller et al., Respondents
110 N.Y. 656·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Elizabeth A. S. Read et al., Appellants, v. John A. Miller et al., Respondents.
(Submitted June 22, 1888;
decided October 2, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Com! in the fifth judicial department, made June 13, 1882, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict.
O. O. Cottle for appellants.
Porter Norton for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.