Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Micajah W. Jackson, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant, 1891 — 124 N.Y. 625 · caselaw · US
General
Micajah W. Jackson, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant
124 N.Y. 625·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Micajah W. Jackson, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.
(Argued December 5, 1890;
decided January 14, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 19, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Henry J. Sullivan for appellant.
George A. Benton for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm, but without prejudice to an application by the defendant to the Supreme Court for such other stay of the issuing of the injunction awarded by it as may, under the circumstances of the case, seem to that court proper; no opinion.
All concur, except Bkadley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.