Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Patrick Donnelly, as Administrator of the Estate of Patrick H. Donnelly, Deceased, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester, Respondent, Impleaded with Another, 1903 — 177 N.Y. 531 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Patrick Donnelly, as Administrator of the Estate of Patrick H. Donnelly, Deceased, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester, Respondent, Impleaded with Another
177 N.Y. 531·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Patrick Donnelly, as Administrator of the Estate of Patrick H. Donnelly, Deceased, Appellant, v. The City of Rochester, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.
Donnelly v. Oity of Bochester, 84 App. Div. 632, affirmed.
(Argued November 30, 1903;
decided December 15, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 16, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
George II. Morris and John & Eeenan for appellant.
W. A. Sutherland, Corporation Counsel (John M. Stull of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin and Cullen, J J. Absent: Gray, J. Not sitting: Werner, J.