Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CARDINAL SPORTING GOODS CO., INC., et al. v. EAGLETON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, et al., 1963 — 374 U.S. 496 · caselaw · US
General
CARDINAL SPORTING GOODS CO., INC., et al. v. EAGLETON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, et al.
374 U.S. 496·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CARDINAL SPORTING GOODS CO., INC., et al. v. EAGLETON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MISSOURI, et al.
No. 904.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Norman Diamond for appellants.
Samuel H. Liberman for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
It appearing from .the motion to dismiss that this case is moot, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri is vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint as moot.