Contracts · MBE-tested
Levin et al. v. Great Western Sugar Co. et al.
396 U.S. 848·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 99.
Levin et al. v. Great Western Sugar Co. et al.
Ralph Wien-shienk, Irving Sonnenschein, and Bernard Rothman for petitioners Levin et al. Simon H. Rifkind, William L. Dill, Jr., and Donald B. Kipp for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.