Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gertrude M. Randall et al., Respondents, v. The Bank of America, Impleaded, etc., and Sherman W. Knevals, as Assignee of William R. Bunker and Charles B. Caldwell, and of the Firm of Caldwell & Bunker, Appellant, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 632 · caselaw · US
General
Gertrude M. Randall et al., Respondents, v. The Bank of America, Impleaded, etc., and Sherman W. Knevals, as Assignee of William R. Bunker and Charles B. Caldwell, and of the Firm of Caldwell & Bunker, Appellant
161 N.Y. 632·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gertrude M. Randall et al., Respondents, v. The Bank of America, Impleaded, etc., and Sherman W. Knevals, as Assignee of William R. Bunker and Charles B. Caldwell, and of the Firm of Caldwell & Bunker, Appellant.
Randall v. Eneráis, 37 App. Div. 146, affirmed.
(Argued November 28, 1899;
decided January 9, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 5, 1898, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Walter S. Logan for appéllant.
Philip G. Bartlett and Alfred B. Thacher for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.