General
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Brewster et al., as Fort Scott Bondholders' Committee, et al.; and Brooks, Administratrix, et al. v. Brewster et al., as Fort Scott Bondholders' Committee, et al.
329 U.S. 775·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 638.
No. 639.
St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. Brewster et al., as Fort Scott Bondholders' Committee, et al.; and Brooks, Administratrix, et al. v. Brewster et al., as Fort Scott Bondholders’ Committee, et al.
November 12, 1946.
William V. Hodges, Daniel Bartlett, C. O. Inman and Phil W. Davis, Jr. for petitioners.
Edwin S. S. Sunderland, Thomas O’G. FitzGibbon, James L. Ho-mire, Henry W. Anderson, George D. Gibson, John W. Riely, Robert T. Swaine, Leonard D. Adkins, Fitzhugh McGrew, Jesse E. Waid, Alexander M. Lewis and Orville W. Wood for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
Reported below: No. 638, 156 F. 2d 161; No. 639,156 F. 2d 158.