Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tubular Woven Fabric Company, Petitioner, v. National Metal Molding Company, 1916 — 241 U.S. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Tubular Woven Fabric Company, Petitioner, v. National Metal Molding Company
241 U.S. 663·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 871.
Tubular Woven Fabric Company, Petitioner, v. National Metal Molding Company.
March 6, 1916.
Mr. William Quiriby, Mr. F..W. Lehmann, Mr. Frank Y. Gladney, Mr. Livingston Gifford and Mr. Peter G. Gerry for the petitioner. Mr. Charles F. Perkins for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the
United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.