Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Virgilio Del Genovesk et al., Respondents, v. The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 614 · caselaw · US
General
Virgilio Del Genovesk et al., Respondents, v. The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Virgilio Del Genovesk et al., Respondents, v. The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant.
Del Genovesk v. Third Avenue R. R. Co., 13 App. Div. 412, affirmed.
(Argued February 1, 1900;
decided March 20, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 27, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Henry L. Scheuerman and Henry M. Ward for appellant.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Pette for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.