Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Almira Godfrey, as Administratrix of James W. Godfrey, Deceased, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 563 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Almira Godfrey, as Administratrix of James W. Godfrey, Deceased, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant
185 N.Y. 563·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Almira Godfrey, as Administratrix of James W. Godfrey, Deceased, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
Godfrey v. City of New York, 104 App. Div. 357, affirmed.
(Argued May 2, 1906;
decided May 22, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 24, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Austen G. Fox of counsel), for appellant.
Frank S. Black and Theodore B. Chancellor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.