Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OMNICARE, INC., et al., petitioners, v. LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYPENSION FUND, et al., 2014 — 135 S. Ct. 45 · caselaw · US
General
OMNICARE, INC., et al., petitioners, v. LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYPENSION FUND, et al.
135 S. Ct. 45189 L. Ed. 2d 894·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OMNICARE, INC., et al., petitioners,
v.
LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYPENSION FUND, et al.
No. 13-435.
Supreme Court of the United States
Oct. 2, 2014.
Opinion
[MAJORITY]
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiaeand for divided argument granted. The time is to be divided as follows: 30 minutes for the petitioners, 20 minutes for the respondents, and 10 minutes for the Solicitor General.