Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna M. Cox, Appellant, v. Julia A. Wisner et al., Respondents, 1901 — 167 N.Y. 579 · caselaw · US
General
Anna M. Cox, Appellant, v. Julia A. Wisner et al., Respondents
167 N.Y. 579·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna M. Cox, Appellant, v. Julia A. Wisner et al., Respondents.
(Argued May 2, 1901;
decided May 17, 1901.)
Cox v. Wisner, 43 App. Div. 591, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 3, 1899, in favor of defendants, upon the submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts, under sections 1279-1281 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
John M. Shedd for appellant.
Charles H. Otis for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Werner, JJ.