Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Arizona et al., 1953 — 346 U.S. 907 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Arizona et al.
346 U.S. 907·Supreme Court of the United States·1953
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 375.
United States v. Arizona et al.
Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States. Ross F. Jones, Attorney General of Arizona, Timothy D. Parkman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, and Irwin Cantor, Assistant to the Attorney General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Hoiness v. United States, 335 U. S. 297.