Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Franklin Haines, Appellant, v. Amzi L. Barber et al., Respondents, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 577 · caselaw · US
General
Franklin Haines, Appellant, v. Amzi L. Barber et al., Respondents
187 N.Y. 577·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Franklin Haines, Appellant, v. Amzi L. Barber et al., Respondents.
Haines v. Barber, 113 App. Div. 696, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 18, 1907;
decided February 26, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 17,1906, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and granted a new trial in an action to restrain the forfeiture of the plaintiff’s rights under a certain agreement and to set aside a sale of certain stock thereunder.
The motion was made upon the ground that the judgment of Special Term was unanimously reversed upon the facts as well as upon the law.
Louis L. Babcock for motion.
Abraham Benedict opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.