General
Ocorr and Rugg Company, Respondent, v. The City of Little Falls, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
178 N.Y. 622·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ocorr and Rugg Company, Respondent, v. The City of Little Falls, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Oeorr & Rugg Oo. v. Gity of Little Falls, 17 App. Div. 592, affirmed.
(Argued May 5, 1904;
decided May 20, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 19, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
A. M. Mills and 8. JET. Newberry for appellant.
John D. Lynn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur; Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Yann and Cullen, JJ.