Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Samuel H. Bradley et al., Appellants, v. James Bigler et al., Respondents, 1880 — 80 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
Samuel H. Bradley et al., Appellants, v. James Bigler et al., Respondents
80 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1880·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel H. Bradley et al., Appellants, v. James Bigler et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 4, 1880;
decided April 6, 1880.)
Decided on the facts in the case.
<7. F. Brown for appellants.
Samuel Hand for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Miller, J.,]
Miller, J.,
reads opinion for affirmance of order and for judgment absolute against plaintiffs on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.