Corporations
C & N SERVICE CORPORATION and Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellants, v. John GARZIA and Division of Workers' Compensation, Appellees
439 So. 2d 1016·Florida District Court of Appeal·1983·FL
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C & N SERVICE CORPORATION and Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellants, v. John GARZIA and Division of Workers’ Compensation, Appellees.
No. AR-292.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Oct. 31, 1983.
Susan J. Silverman, of Marlow, Shofi, Ortmayer, Smith, Connell & Valerius, Miami, for appellants.
Howard L. Silverstein, of Silverstein & Heilman, P.A., Miami, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The deputy commissioner’s finding that chiropractic treatment was required by the continuing nature of claimant’s injury is supported by substantial competent evidence and proper in law. See section 440.-13, Florida Statutes (1977), Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Pittman, 49 So.2d 600 (Fla.1950), and Lopez v. Pennsuco Cement & Aggregates, Inc., 401 So.2d 875 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.