Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William C. Bryant, as Executor of Joseph N. Tifft, Deceased, Appellant, v. Sarah A. Gay et al., Respondents, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
William C. Bryant, as Executor of Joseph N. Tifft, Deceased, Appellant, v. Sarah A. Gay et al., Respondents
153 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William C. Bryant, as Executor of Joseph N. Tifft, Deceased, Appellant, v. Sarah A. Gay et al., Respondents.
Bryant v. Gay, 88 Hun, 614, affirmed.
(Argued April 28, 1897;
decided May 14, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered September 23, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon the report of a referee.
John G. Milburn and George J. Sieard for appellant.
George Wadsworth and Elvjah W. Holt for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.