General
Corcoran v. City of Chicago
311 U.S. 610·Supreme Court of the United States·1940
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 326.
Corcoran v. City of Chicago.
October 14, 1940.
Mr. Charles■ C. Spencer for appellant. Messrs. Barnet Hodes and J. Herzl Segal for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee Power Co. v. Carolina-Tenn. Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. (2) Escanaba & Lake Michigan Co. v. Chicago, 107 U. S. 678, 688-689; Permoli v. First Municipality, 3 How. 589, 610; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., 223 U. S. 390, 401. (3) Pearson v. Yewdall, 95 U. S. 294, 296; Minneapolis & St. Louis R. Co. v. Bombolis, 241 U. S. 211, 217.