Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francisco Dones, Appellant, v. Jose Urrutia, Warden of the Penitenitary of Porto Rico, 1906 — 202 U.S. 614 · caselaw · US
General
Francisco Dones, Appellant, v. Jose Urrutia, Warden of the Penitenitary of Porto Rico
202 U.S. 614·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 685.
Francisco Dones, Appellant, v. Jose Urrutia, Warden of the Penitenitary of Porto Rico.
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico.
Submitted May 14, 1906.
Decided May 28, 1906.
Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. J. S. Flannery for appellant.
The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Final order affirmed with costs. Act April 12, 1900, 31 Stat. 77, c. 191, secs. 33, 34, 35, 15; Ortega v. Lara, ante, p. 339; Perez v. Fernandez, ante, p. 80; Porto Rican Laws and Code of Civil Procedure, 1904, pp. 103, 104, 110; Ex parte Ward, 173 U. S. 452, 454; United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Company, 176 U. S. 211, 214.