Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hugh P. Strong et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Buffalo Land and Exploration Company, 1906 — 203 U.S. 582 · caselaw · US
General
Hugh P. Strong et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Buffalo Land and Exploration Company
203 U.S. 582·Supreme Court of the United States·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 36.
Hugh P. Strong et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Buffalo Land and Exploration Company.
Submitted October 18, 1906.
Decided October 29, 1906.
Mr. J. M. Vale, Mr. John Brennan, Mr. Moses E. Clapp and Mr. Newel H. Clapp for plaintiff in error. Mr; WilKam C. White for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs on the authority of Midway Company v. Eaton, 183 U. S. 602.