Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David E. HILL, petitioner, v. Rudolph CONTRERAS, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia., 2015 — 136 S. Ct. 488 · caselaw · US
General
David E. HILL, petitioner, v. Rudolph CONTRERAS, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
136 S. Ct. 488193 L. Ed. 2d 347·Supreme Court of the United States·2015
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David E. HILL, petitioner,
v.
Rudolph CONTRERAS, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
No. 15-6177.
Supreme Court of the United States
Nov. 9, 2015.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.