Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry R. C. Watson, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 475 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Henry R. C. Watson, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent
175 N.Y. 475·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry R. C. Watson, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Watson v. City of New York, 67 App. Div. 573, affirmed.
(Argued May 5, 1903;
decided May 19, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered Jan-nary 28, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
David B. Ogden for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Counsel {Theodore Connol/y and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, Bartlett, BLaight, Martin and Vann, JJ. Not voting : O’Brien, J.