Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lewis Friedman, Appellant, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Respondents, 1905 — 180 N.Y. 550 · caselaw · US
General
Lewis Friedman, Appellant, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Respondents
180 N.Y. 550·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lewis Friedman, Appellant, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al., Respondents.
Friedman v. N. Y. & Harlem, R. R. Co., 89 App. Div. 38, affirmed.
(Argued January 19, 1905;
decided February 3, 1905.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 7,1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
Charles W. Culver and Frank M. 'Hardenbrook for appellant.
Ira A. Place and George H. Walker for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Gray, J.