Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Duquesne Club v. Bell, Former Acting Collector of Internal Revenue; and Duquesne Club v. Driscoll, Collector of Internal Revenue, 1942 — 317 U.S. 638 · caselaw · US
Tax
Duquesne Club v. Bell, Former Acting Collector of Internal Revenue; and Duquesne Club v. Driscoll, Collector of Internal Revenue
317 U.S. 638·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 105.
Duquesne Club v. Bell, Former Acting Collector of Internal Revenue; and Duquesne Club v. Driscoll, Collector of Internal Revenue.
No. 106.
October 12, 1942.
Messrs. George B. Furman, Paul Armitage,, and Edward Holloway for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch, and Carlton Fox for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.