Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Starr, Attorney General, v. Schram, Receiver, 1941 — 314 U.S. 695 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Starr, Attorney General, v. Schram, Receiver
314 U.S. 695·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nos. 731 and 732.
Starr, Attorney General, v. Schram, Receiver.
December 22, 1941.
Messrs. Herbert J. Rushton, Attorney General of Michigan, JamesF. Shepherd, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Merlin Wiley for petitioner. Messrs. Robert S. Marx, Frank E. Wood, and George P. Barse for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Murphy took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.