Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francisco Wood, Respondent, v. The Town of Gilboa, Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 383 · caselaw · US
General
Francisco Wood, Respondent, v. The Town of Gilboa, Appellant
146 N.Y. 383·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Francisco Wood, Respondent, v. The Town of Gilboa, Appellant.
(Argued April 23, 1895;
decided May 21, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made February 13, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for a new trial.
I. H. Maynard for appellant.
3. Krum for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray, J., dissenting.
'Order affirmed.