Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
TV PIX, INC., et al. v. TAYLOR et al., 1970 — 396 U.S. 556 · caselaw · US
General
TV PIX, INC., et al. v. TAYLOR et al.
396 U.S. 556·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TV PIX, INC., et al. v. TAYLOR et al.
No. 214.
Decided February 2, 1970
George M. McMillan for appellants.
Harvey Dickerson, Attorney General of Nevada, for appellees.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Getter for the United States, and by Paul Rodgers for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. E. Stratford Smith and Bruce Lovett filed a brief for the National Cable Television Association, Inc., as amicus curiae.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The motion for leave to file the motion to dismiss or affirm is also granted.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.