Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Louisiana Public Service Commission et al. v. United States et al., 1954 — 348 U.S. 885 · caselaw · US
General
Louisiana Public Service Commission et al. v. United States et al.
348 U.S. 885·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
November 22, 1954.
No. 351.
Louisiana Public Service Commission et al. v. United States et al.
Fred S. LeBlanc, Attorney General of Louisiana, Joel B. Dickinson, Assistant Attorney General, and Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr. for the Louisiana Public Service Commission, and Louis A. Schwartz for the New Orleans Traffic & Transportation Bureau et al., appellants.
Solicitor General Sobeloff and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission; and Harry McCall, William E. Davis, A. J. Dixon, Harold E. Spencer and Y. D. Lott for the Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.