General
Sarah E. O'Callaghan, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant
174 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah E. O’Callaghan, Respondent, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Appellant.
O'Callaghan v. Metropolitan Street By. Co., 69 App, Div. 574, afihmed.
(Submitted March 6, 1903;
decided March 24, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department,, entered March 19, 1902, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Charles F. Brown, Bayard IT. Ames and Henry A. Robinson for appellant.
Thomas P. Wickes and Charles R. La Rue for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting : Gray, J.